Loading…
18
Struggling with honesty when a friend's wine didn't meet expectations...
Tasted a friend's new release and it was overly tannic and unbalanced... I didn't want to hurt their feelings, so my notes were vague. It's a gray area between professional integrity and personal relationships.
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
lee2417mo ago
I recall a piece in Decanter where a seasoned taster discussed the 'compliment sandwich' for tough feedback (praise, critique, praise). They argued it preserves relationships while offering constructive points, like suggesting the wine might benefit from more bottle age to soften those tannins. The key was framing critiques as future opportunities, which feels less personal. Another tip from that article was to focus on objective descriptors, like saying 'the tannins are prominent' instead of 'this is bad', which can make the conversation more about shared learning.
7
jackson.victor7mo ago
Seriously? I find it hard to believe that objective descriptors remove the personal sting from feedback.
5
king.andrew7mo ago
Examine the idea that objective descriptors depersonalize feedback. Honestly, I've been in meetings where phrasing critiques as "the narrative pace lags in the middle" instead of "your writing is boring" completely altered the recipient's engagement. Tbh, it frames the issue as a shared problem to solve, not a personal failure. Ngl, some people will still hear any critique as an attack if they're deeply attached, so the delivery tone matters just as much as the words. So how do we genuinely separate the creator from the creation when the work feels like part of them? What specific techniques have you found that actually make feedback feel collaborative rather than critical?
7