O
-1

Switched from a 3/8 inch mortar joint to a 1/2 inch on a big chimney job

I always thought a tighter joint looked cleaner and was just as strong. On this big chimney rebuild in Springfield, the foreman insisted we use a half inch joint for the firebrick liner. After the first day, I saw why. The wider joint gave us way more room to work the mortar in fully behind the brick, leaving no voids. It also handled the heat expansion better without cracking. We finished the whole stack in three days with zero callbacks. Anyone else find a wider joint works better for high heat areas?
3 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
3 Comments
miles_sanchez
miles_sanchez1mo agoMost Upvoted
Guess I'm just not seeing the big deal here. A quarter inch difference in a joint feels like splitting hairs. If the brick is laid right and the mortar is mixed right, it should hold up fine either way. Heat expansion is real, but most chimneys from the last fifty years have thin joints and they're still standing. Sounds like maybe the foreman just liked the way it looked or had an old habit.
8
richard_dixon
You think a quarter inch doesn't matter? It's the difference between a repair and a rebuild.
7
quinn_wood
quinn_wood1mo ago
Honestly, a fifty year old chimney with thin joints is a ticking time bomb. I've seen three of them fail just last year in my area, all from cracked mortar that let heat into the outer wall. That quarter inch is the difference between a joint that can flex and one that just splits. Your foreman wasn't being picky, he was saving you from a rebuild in five years.
3